Neutral or Bad?[]
People keep changing it to bad/neutral so this is where we will discuss it.
I think she should be neutral. i agree on neutral
- The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cowcubrub (talk • contribs).
- She's a demon queen who eats human souls. Just because she happens to be the wife of Deadpool doesn't make her slightly neutral or good.
- Our definition of Bad Characters is that of "Bad Characters are generally on the wrong side of the law, or work against the greater good of humanity." Consuming human souls is not very humanitarian.
- --The ADour-incible ADour (talk) 23:13, January 4, 2015 (UTC)
- I say neutral as well. Even though she's a succubus with a natural tendency for eating people's soul, wears a suit of human skin, try to eat Wade's soul during their first meeting... she didn't turn around and rip Wade's head off after he recovers, she had two chances to kill Blade but didn't, shows compassion toward Ellie's family (Deadpool 37), self-conscious about her own nature ("I'm not a horrible monster am I?" -Deadpool Gauntlet 5) etc... I think it's just a matter of circumstances (meeting Wade) that she is currently neutral, while she still has to show a degree of strength to rule over her monstrous subjects.
- So unless she goes on a killing spree or work against the heroes (Blade fight was self defense), I think she could be listed as neutral. I've been following Deadpool closely and she hasn't done anything montrous so far. But then again if the site's definition of Bad Characters is such, so be it. (Though I haven't seen her working on the wrong side of the law - she's a queen of the Monster Metropolis and has to act like a queen - or against the greater good of humanity - I haven't seen her trying to eat an innocent person's soul... maybe only except Deadpool's which is kinda ironic)
- K4Anarky (talk) 23:32, January 4, 2015 (UTC)
- I definitely say that she should be defined as bad. Consuming the souls of helpless mooks is even worse than if she strapped them to a table and performed torture, degradation, dehumanisation, violation, dehumanisation, and experimentation upon them. And Deadpool is a thrill-killing psychopath. As blatantly seen when he turned good from being inverted, he is not remotely an innocent himself. Antvasima (talk) 05:10, January 5, 2015 (UTC)
Without including myself into this discussion (couldn't care less), could you please refrain from using nazi-comparisons? Godwin's Law really pops out everywhere. It's not cool. AntiPatriot (talk) 18:02, January 11, 2015 (UTC)
- I would definitely agree with you if the topic was about the comparatively trivial political matters in which Nazism is usually invoked, but this is about taking excruciating pleasure sadistically eating souls. That genuinely is of genocide camp guard level or above. Still, to compromise, I have removed the mention. Antvasima (talk) 05:32, January 12, 2015 (UTC)