FANDOM

LoveWaffle

Content Moderator
  • I live in Atlanta
  • I was born on June 11
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Since you're the one who made the pages for characters and episodes for the show The Gifted (TV series), I'd like you to give your 2 cents on Talk:The Gifted (TV series) regarding its place in the reality Earth-TRN414.

      Loading editor
    • “One of the great favors that Days of Future Past did for all of us is establish that there are many streams,” “One answer is that we exist in one of those streams. This is its own universe, we don’t exist in the same timeline as any specific movie or comics. But there are shared characters. We’re doing our own thing, and, as I say, there are many streams.”

      Link

      That pretty much answers it. Although I REALLY need to take more notice of the timeline. The series references events that happened in the 50s, two decades before the "streams" diverged in the 70s.

      Continuity with these FOX properties is a real headache.

        Loading editor
    • I feel you on that. I've even heard some arguments that the Deadpool movies might not be in TRN414 (most noteable difference being Colossus being Russian, unlike the Colossus (Peter) we saw in the 10005 movies), but I feel for their movies including 'The New Mutants' should be a good placeholder for them until further notice (like with 'Logan' being assigned TRN414, before it got its own official designation).

      So should I go ahead and give a TRN designation and add the necessary move tags?

        Loading editor
    • Probably, yeah.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I noticed you required a proper image for Talbot as Graviton, and the recent promo just previewed that.

      Loading editor
    • I noticed that in the preview. Can that image be put up before next week's episode? The blanked-out comment I left on the page was there to discourage anyone from putting the picture of him in his military attire in its place.

        Loading editor
    • We generally have the rule that new costumes and looks for characters, should only be put up when said product it first appears in comes out. Similar to character pages.

      For example, Baby Groot in 'GotG Vol. 2'. Before that movie had come out, on the MCU Groot page we had Groot as a sapling as the main image, before we had the Baby Groot one.

      And with Talbot as Graviton, maybe it's better to wait for when the episode airs to get a better quality image of him in that costume (rather than the one in that article I linked).

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I noticed that on Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Season 4 22 the planet Maveth is listed as one of the locations that appears in it. Unless I missed something, is it meant to be the place where Robbie opened a portal to in order to return the Darkhold to, since he mentioned there are more than one types of Hell?

      Loading editor
    • I think I mistakenly tagged it {{a| instead of {{mentioned|.

        Loading editor
    • That would make sense, since unless I'm thinking of a different episode, there was one part where Coulson tells Talbot on the phone about the weird stuff they've done before, it includes him having a robotic hand, and them traveling across the universe to another planet (Maveth).

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey. Shouldn't the Deadpool 2 article be titled Deadpool 2 (film)? Just asking cause that's the case with Iron Man 2 (film) and Iron Man 3 (film).

    Also, there's info on the Earth-TRN414 page for both Deadpool 2 and New Mutants if you need info.

      Loading editor
    • The examples have qualifiers to allow for disambiguation articles, thus it would only be necessary if someone were to propose a legitimate need for disambiguation of the term "Deadpool 2."

        Loading editor
    • Okay, gotcha.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Please take a moment to clarify your position on two parts of the Appearance discussion consensus. Thanks.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi!

    Thanks for your edits !

    As far, I have one question, I don't recall Xandar and Xandarians being mentioned in Agents of SHIELD, and even less in three different episodes, and Inhumans being clearly stated to be created

    Another thing, the chronology must be respected and sections (IMO) make it easier to navigate and clearer.

    I will try to help complete those as well (but I'm more on the Earth-616 version of their history currently). If we have 6 months before the premiere of the Inhumans series, that leaves us some time before the "deadline" where readers will reach high numbers.

      Loading editor
    • I don't recall Xandar and Xandarians being mentioned in Agents of SHIELD

      I really only elaborated on the Kree coming to Earth and creating Inhumans in that opening paragraph. I left the previous text mostly intact. There wasn't a source pointing to Guardians of the Galaxy before and just didn't think to add one afterwards.

        Loading editor
    • Okay. In this case, it seems really important to stick to what is known, and consequently to be careful to add references for distinct paragraphs or sentences where they do prove something, and to remain more vague if required (but on the other hand, on Inhuman History, it forces me to keep some material unused currently...).

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • When deleting images, please don't forget to update their links of the pages they're featured on. For example, I'm not sure why you deleted my user image? But you didn't fix it on my user page or on the Administrators page, in which every other admin has their own user image too. I noticed another Doctor Doom image was deleted the other day too, just wondering was that you too? Not trying to sound mean, just checking in.

      Loading editor
    • I've been going through the list of broken and double redirects. I use Special:WhatLinksHere for everything in the list, fixing redirects where I need to. Since most of them appear to be artifacts left over from earlier moves, I end up deleting a lot of old redirects that aren't needed anymore. I thought it was weird that something with your name would show up in there, but that service didn't show it linked to anything. Glitch in the system, I guess.

      EDIT: Just to clarify, I haven't been deleting any images, only redirects.

        Loading editor
    • I gotcha. Thanks for deleting all of those awful redirects. Looks like someone else must have deleted the image mine redirected to? But good luck finding that on the Deletion Log so oh well. Thank you for the clarification, and yes I'd be lost without the WhatLinksHere page

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I was wondering how you think we should handle shows like Marvel's Daredevil and Marvel's Jessica Jones, both of which has been renewed for another season, but won't return until 2018 at their earliest, after The Defenders has come out.

    On the Marvel Television Series-page, we have both listed as "(2015-present)", but should we change that up to not give the impression that there was/will be something released in 2017 in regards to those shows, something like "(2015-2016) (2018)"?

    Of the other shows on that page, I'm not an expert so I can't think of any other shows that took a break for a year, and had at least 1 year in between seasons.

      Loading editor
    • I think it's fine as is. It's becoming more frequent for TV series to take longer gaps between seasons. Daredevil and Jessica Jones are the only series on that page as of now to be affected by this, but I would suspect that will change once we get more Netflix series and Legion debuts on FX. The Netflix series aren't expected to keep to a yearly release cycle, Daredevil S2 being something of a fluke so Marvel TV could find a reason to delay work on Iron Fist.

      We could just leave a line on those series' episode list pages along the lines of "Jessica Jones was renewed for a second season, expected to debut sometime in 2018."

      Or something like that, I don't actually know when Jessica Jones is expected to come back.

        Loading editor
    • LoveWaffle wrote: Daredevil S2 being something of a fluke[...]

      As in it barely was a commercial success? I don't really pay attention to ratings and streaming amounts for shows in general, so that sounds kinda surprising to me.

      But yeah, now that I think about it, it may be unnecessary, if it doesn't apply to any other shows having year-gaps.

        Loading editor
    • A fluke in that it's going to be the only season of one of Marvel's Netflix series that gets released around a year after the previous one. "Outlier" probably would've been a better word to use. Netflix doesn't release anything like ratings data.

        Loading editor
    • Right, I was confused with the word, since English isn't my first language. Though somehow I find pieces of text on this site that could've been written better even by me, in regards to their grammar and structure.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Question do you read manga?

      Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message