It's not fixed. It's currently under discussion, and seeing how these game intrusions keep surfacing we can expect it to persist until the people putting the information conflicts into the articles stop doing it.
I don't remember if you joined this discussion, but in it I recommended that if someone would add something Spoiler-heavy to Iron Man 3, they should mark it as a minor edit, so that other people will have a chance to filter them out.
I noticed that you added two move tags to two of the movie characters. Although I haven't checked what they need to be moved to, cause of probably heavy spoiler reasons.
Because a few months back someone decided to jump the gun and publish speculative data. There was a forceful reaction from a number of other contributors, basically telling him to knock it off. Wikis are a place to document known quantities, and generally not a place to presume, speculate, or post assumptions.
If you have a look at the edit pane, you'll also see a note left by Lovewaffles requesting that no presumption be published until the characters are confirmed. I agree with that message too.
I'm not sure why you're apologising to me, but no matter. It was fixed before I even read this post. What you got wrong was you didn't close your link brackets correctly...
{{a|[[New York City]}} <-- Note the single link bracket at the end.
{{a|[[New York City]]}} <-- What you were intending to do, which would have worked.
I should also add that if you use the "Preview" function, you'll be able to review your changes before you publish them. It helps to avoid mistakes like this one.
hey here, good catch on the vandal there. in the future, could you also drop a note to an admin when you discover such edits so we can block the guy? thanks!
I was getting ready for work, and was going to get around that when I got home - I couldn't see any sysops active in the recent changes at the time.
I don't know how bad the vandalism is on this wiki, but I've had cause to maintain a Vandalism Report page elsewhere. It saves a bit of hassle choosing a sysop to message, and there are a number of us who will pick up on the report and block the offender. The concept might work here too.
it's not that bad here - I rarely remember a case when a vandal wasn't caught wiothon 24 hourse. as for the sysops, we usually watch each other's talk pages as well, so alerting one will most often alert the others as well.
The information provided was not speculative information. For example, the jotuns broke into the weapons vault specifically. Furthermore, I see no problem being specific about whom Thor's friends were. Regardless, I will respect your request and stop removing the links and altering the information.